Tsukuba Circuit, time trial: 1:04.62 on a hot lap. However, all of the higher top speed machines use forced induction to reach their respective top speeds, whereas the McLaren F1 is naturally aspirated. The F1 remains one of the fastest production cars ever made as of July 2013 it is succeeded by very few cars, including the Koenigsegg Agera R, the Bugatti Veyron, the SSC Ultimate Aero TT, the Hennessey Venom GT and the Bugatti Veyron Super Sport. Ron Dennis | McLaren Automotive Performance I enjoy driving mine more today than ever before because I find its technical purity highly satisfying the F1 remains one of McLaren’s proudest achievements. Its styling is enduring and will never fade. Whether endurance racing or on road, it is supremely fast, agile and yet comfortable. Nuts about any form of classic motorsport and muscle cars, Ciprian's currently working on a time machine that would take him back to the 1960s for a long vacation alongside Dan Gurney and Jim Hall.The F1 is a technological tour-de-force and a real triumph in terms of packaging and design. Don’t let his grumpiness fool you though he’s more than excited to provide the latest news and reviews on the most interesting cars in the industry. Additionally, he can give you several reasons why there’s still no replacement for displacement. Nothing annoys him more than car electronics, and he just hates it when performance cars lack a third pedal. Ask him to choose between a BMW M4 and an Audi RS5, and he’ll gladly trade both for a beat-up ’Cuda. He's a proud member of the TopSpeed team since early 2014.Īlthough he's into just about any type of vehicle, Ciprian is not your typical car enthusiast. His automotive adventure started reporting on various motorsport events as a sports writer before moving onto a full-time auto career with various sites, including This Week In Motors and Autoevolution. What's more, these storage compartments are actually innovative features that we should see more often in production cars. That's notably less than the McLaren GT, but it's better than nothing. Each of them can carry up to four cubic feet of luggage, meaning that the F1's capacity amounts to only eight cubic feet. Yes, I know, it's not the kind of comparison you want to hear when talking about supercars, but buses and some trucks are the only vehicles that have similar "trunks." Obviously, these spaces aren't big. In the absence of conventional storage room behind or above the engine, Murray designed luggage compartments in the lower rear fenders.Ĭovered by seamless lids, these are similar to the storage compartments found in buses, which carry luggage under the floor. Gordon Murray wanted the F1 to offer a race experience, but it also wanted the car to be somewhat practical. Although it doesn't have a trunk in the rear or storage space in the front, the F1 boasts two storage compartments into the side skirts. Is the F1 as practical as the GT? Not really, but this iconic supercar is more practical than other supercars from the era. Combined, the McLaren GT offers 20.1 cubic feet of luggage room, which is comparable to many midsize and even full-size sedans. This space is smaller, though, and it can take only 5.3 cubic feet of luggage. Just like the 570GT and other mid-engined grand tourers before it, the GT also offers some room under the front hood. That's seven cubic feet more than the 570GT and on par with many compact sedans. Due to the low placement of the 4.0-liter V-8 engine, the trunk has a total capacity of 14.8 cubic feet. This feature is shared only with the McLaren 570GT and the Porsche 718 Cayman. Although it's not the first mid-engined grand tourer with a trunk, it's among the very few that have a trunk atop the engine. The McLaren GT is the most practical car the British firm has built up until now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |